| Constitutional Law I Teaching Material Prepared by: Sileshi Zeyohannes & Dagnachew Asrat Prepared under the Sponsorship of the Justice and Legal System Research Institute 2009 |
Foundations of Constitutional Law and the State
The study of constitutional law requires a paradigm approach to model the state as a political and legal entity. At its core, the state is a system of interaction found in independent societies that performs functions of integration and adaptation through the employment or threat of legitimate physical compulsion. Law acts as the sum of conditions for social life, secured by state power through compulsion. A constitution serves as the primary mechanism through which political power is converted into an institution of the state, providing the basis for structured power and the legitimization of authority.
Political Culture and the Theory of Consent
A society’s political culture is defined by its degree of consensus regarding substantive and procedural rules. In consensual societies, people accept and use the government according to internalized rules, whereas non-consensual societies may have governments that operate under no accepted rules or rely on outright force. Political power within these cultures is the capacity to influence or control behavior, often mediated through institutions like political parties that convert public demands into governmental action.
Sovereignty and International Evolution
Sovereignty represents a cluster of powers consisting of both internal and external aspects. Historically, the Westphalia state system established the principle of sovereign equality, but the concept has evolved significantly over time. Modern sovereignty is increasingly viewed as a dynamic and functional concept, where absolute sovereignty has given way to relative or planetary sovereignty due to global interdependence and the rise of international human rights and environmental standards.
Democracy versus Constitutionalism
Democratic theory is rooted in human dignity and the belief that adults should have political autonomy by sharing in the governance of their state. Because direct rule is often unfeasible, democracy relies on delegating authority to chosen representatives. Conversely, constitutionalism insists on limited government and substantive limits on what a government can do, even if it reflects the popular will. While democracy is often associated with majoritarian politics, constitutionalism serves as a counter-majoritarian force intended to protect individual rights and ensure predictability in governmental actions.
Historical Paradigms of the State
The development of the state in Western civilization began with the Greek city-state, which was viewed as a spiritual bond for common self-realization. This evolved into the Roman empire-state, characterized by a complex mix of monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic elements, though it eventually succumbed to autocracy. Modern nation-states were propelled by the Industrial Revolution, which shifted political weight from landowning aristocracies to new capitalist and urban classes, leading to the spread of nationalism and liberalism.
The Ethiopian Constitutional Journey
Ethiopian history shifted from a traditional absolute monarchy to a modernized state through several paradigms. The 1931 Constitution, modeled after the Japanese Meiji paradigm, was a gift from the Emperor intended to centralize power. Following a brief period influenced by the Westminster model in 1955, the 1974 revolution introduced a Soviet paradigm, characterized by a vanguard party, totalitarian control, and the elimination of private property. This was later replaced by the 1991 Transitional Charter, which served as a prelude to federalism by emphasizing the self-determination of nations, nationalities, and peoples.
Classifying and Organizing Power
Constitutions are classified by their nature, such as written versus unwritten, though most systems are actually hybrids. They are also categorized by the structure of the executive. A monosepalous executive features a single head of government, as seen in the United Kingdom or United States. A bicephalous executive, like that of France, has two heads of power (a President and a Prime Minister). Finally, an acephalous or dispersed leadership model, seen in Germany or Japan, involves power being shared among multiple institutions or group leaders.
Forms of Government and Electoral Systems
In a presidential system, the president is both Head of State and Head of Government, presiding separately from the legislature with a fixed term of office. Parliamentary systems divide these roles, making the executive dependent on the support of the legislature, often through a party or coalition. To fill these offices, majoritarian electoral systems like First-Past-the-Post prioritize governability and often lead to winner-take-all results. In contrast, proportional representation focuses on the inclusion of minority voices by dividing seats according to the share of votes cast for party lists.
Interpreting and Amending the Supreme Law
Constitutional interpretation involves various methods, including textual analysis of the lawgiver’s words, historical analysis of drafting history, and functional analysis of how structures are intended to work. Other methods include doctrinal reliance on precedents and equitable decisions based on a sense of justice. Under the Ethiopian framework, ratified international treaties are an integral part of the law, and human rights provisions must be interpreted in conformity with international instruments. Amendment procedures determine if a constitution is rigid or flexible, with rigid constitutions requiring a special procedure, such as a supermajority or a referendum.